BoxLayout(orientation='vertical')
与 GridLayout(cols=1)
:
他们都做同样的事情,不是吗?有理由选择其中一个吗?
They both do the same thing, no? Is there a reason to choose one over the other?
区别在于大小和位置.
一般来说,GridLayout
(cols: 1
) 总是将元素保持在一列中,而有使用 BoxLayout
(orientation: 'vertical'
) 时更灵活地组织单个小部件.
In general, GridLayout
(cols: 1
) is always going to keep the elements in one column, whereas there is more flexibility to organize individual widgets when you use BoxLayout
(orientation: 'vertical'
).
这是一个非常简单的示例,说明您可以使用 BoxLayout
进行操作,因为它支持 pos_hint
、size
和 size_hint
(以及其他,例如 center_x
、x
、y
、right
,-注意它们也依赖于BoxLayout
的 vertical
或 horizontal
方向会影响各个小部件:
Here is a very simple example of something you can do with BoxLayout
because it honours pos_hint
, size
and size_hint
(and others such as center_x
, x
, y
, right
, - notice that they also depend on the vertical
or horizontal
orientation of the BoxLayout
) which affects individual widgets:
<Test@BoxLayout>:
orientation: 'vertical'
Button:
text: 'a'
size_hint: None, None
size: 100,50
pos_hint: { 'center_x' : .5 }
Button:
text: 'b'
这是 200x200 屏幕中的输出:
This is the output in a 200x200 screen:
如果您尝试做同样的事情,但改用 GridLayout
,那么您会得到:
If you attempt to do the same but using GridLayout
instead, then you get this:
最后,GridLayout
有一些属性来控制列的大小:
Finally, GridLayout
has some properties to control the size of the column:
col_default_width
:为所有列的默认宽度col_width
:每列的宽度列表(在此没有用处案例,因为我们只有一个)col_force_default
:它将忽略单个小部件的任何现有 size_hint
或 size
并强制列宽minimum_width
:所以列不会缩小太多col_default_width
: for the default width of all the columnscol_width
: a list of widths for each column (not useful in this
case since we have just one) col_force_default
: which will ignore any existing size_hint
or size
for individual widgets and force the column widthminimum_width
: so the column not shrink too much这篇关于Kivy:BoxLayout 与 GridLayout的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!