作为这个问题的扩展const_iterators
是否更快?,我还有一个关于 const_iterators
的问题.如何删除 const_iterator
的常量性?虽然迭代器是指针的一般形式,但 const_iterator
和 iterator
仍然是两个不同的东西.因此,我相信,我也不能使用 const_cast<>
从 const_iterator
转换到 iterator
s.
As an extension to this question Are const_iterators
faster?, I have another question on const_iterators
. How to remove constness of a const_iterator
?
Though iterators are generalised form of pointers but still const_iterator
and iterator
s are two different things. Hence, I believe, I also cannot use const_cast<>
to covert from const_iterator
to iterator
s.
一种方法可能是您定义一个迭代器,它移动 '直到 const_iterator
指向的元素.但这看起来是一个线性时间算法.
One approach could be that you define an iterator which moves 'til the element to which const_iterator
points. But this looks to be a linear time algorithm.
知道实现这一目标的最佳方法是什么吗?
Any idea on what is the best way to achieve this?
在 C++11 中有一个具有恒定时间复杂度的解决方案:对于任何序列、关联或无序关联容器(包括所有标准库容器),可以调用range-erase成员函数,范围为空:
There is a solution with constant time complexity in C++11: for any sequence, associative, or unordered associative container (including all of the Standard Library containers), you can call the range-erase member function with an empty range:
template <typename Container, typename ConstIterator>
typename Container::iterator remove_constness(Container& c, ConstIterator it)
{
return c.erase(it, it);
}
范围擦除成员函数有一对const_iterator
参数,但它们返回一个iterator
.因为提供了一个空范围,所以对erase 的调用不会改变容器的内容.
The range-erase member functions have a pair of const_iterator
parameters, but they return an iterator
. Because an empty range is provided, the call to erase does not change the contents of the container.
感谢 Howard Hinnant 和 Jon Kalb 的技巧.
这篇关于如何删除 const_iterator 的常量性?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!