我的代码看起来像这样:
I have code which looks something like this:
thing_index = thing_list.index(thing)
otherfunction(thing_list, thing_index)
好的，这很简单，但你明白了.现在 thing 可能实际上不在列表中，在这种情况下，我想将 -1 作为 thing_index 传递.在其他语言中，如果 index() 找不到元素，这就是您所期望的返回值.实际上它会抛出一个 ValueError.
ok so that's simplified but you get the idea. Now thing might not actually be in the list, in which case I want to pass -1 as thing_index. In other languages this is what you'd expect index() to return if it couldn't find the element. In fact it throws a ValueError.
我可以这样做:
try:
thing_index = thing_list.index(thing)
except ValueError:
thing_index = -1
otherfunction(thing_list, thing_index)
但这感觉很脏，而且我不知道是否会因其他原因引发 ValueError.我根据生成器函数想出了以下解决方案，但看起来有点复杂:
But this feels dirty, plus I don't know if ValueError could be raised for some other reason. I came up with the following solution based on generator functions, but it seems a little complex:
thing_index = ( [(i for i in xrange(len(thing_list)) if thing_list[i]==thing)] or [-1] )[0]
有没有更简洁的方法来实现同样的目标?假设列表没有排序.
Is there a cleaner way to achieve the same thing? Let's assume the list isn't sorted.
使用 try-except 子句并没有什么脏".这是pythonic的方式.ValueError 将仅由 .index 方法引发，因为它是您那里唯一的代码！
There is nothing "dirty" about using try-except clause. This is the pythonic way. ValueError will be raised by the .index method only, because it's the only code you have there!
回答评论:
在 Python 中，请求宽恕比获得许可更容易 理念已经确立，no index 不会针对任何其他问题引发此类错误.不是我能想到的.
To answer the comment:
In Python, easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission philosophy is well established, and no index will not raise this type of error for any other issues. Not that I can think of any.
这篇关于在python中处理list.index(可能不存在)的最佳方法?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持跟版网！