我目前正在尝试测试是否确实收到了网络响应.
I am currently attempting to test that a network response is actually being received.
虽然我知道这不是我在测试方面应该做的事情,但这是我自己的好奇心,如果可能的话,我想继续.
就目前而言,我已经成功创建了测试.请求被毫无问题地发送到排球队列.
As it stands, I have successfully created the test. A request is sent to a volley queue without issue.
现在奇怪的部分:
该请求永远不会执行.这是我如何测试它的想法:
That request is never executed. Here's an idea of how I'm testing it:
@Test
public void testSimpleGetResponseFromServerVolley() throws Exception {
final CountDownLatch signal = new CountDownLatch(1);
NetworkClass.NetworkListener listener = new NetworkClass.NetworkListener() {
@Override
public void onResponse(Response response) {
assertThat(response != null);
System.out.println("Got Response");
signal.countDown();
}
@Override
public void onError(Throwable error) {
System.out.println("No Response");
signal.countDown();
}
};
NetworkClass.getResponseFromServer(null, listener);
signal.await();
}
此代码意外导致测试挂起并且永远无法完成.
This code unexpectedly causes the test to hang and never complete.
然而,这是我不再对情况失去理解的地方:
如果我通过 debug 运行测试并逐行执行,则测试成功执行,并收到响应.
If I run the test via debug and step through line by line, the test successfully executes, and response is received.
我认为正在发生的事情:
当我通过调试单步执行时,volley requestQueue 成功进行并发出请求,并在调用 await()
之前收到响应.
When I step through via debug, the volley requestQueue successfully carries on and makes the request, and the response is received before await()
is called.
当我不通过调试单步执行时,await()
会阻塞处理所有这些的线程.
When I don't step through via debug, await()
is blocking the thread which handles all of that.
关于如何处理这个问题的任何想法?
Any ideas on how I can handle this?
Volley 依赖 Looper.getMainLooper()
来处理其执行.当使用 RobolectricTestRunner 时,Robolectric 会对此进行模拟,因此它不会正确设置,从而导致测试失败.
Volley relies on Looper.getMainLooper()
to handle its executions. When using a RobolectricTestRunner, Robolectric mocks this out and as such it will not be correctly set up, thus resulting in a failed test.
在我的具体情况下,当我使用断点时,系统实际上确实设置了主循环器,因为系统正在利用它来显示断点/调试工具.因此,这描述了我最初的问题中发现的行为背后的原因.
In my specific case, when I was using breakpoints, the system actually does set up the main looper, because the system is utilizing it to show the breakpoints / debugging tools. This thus describes the reasoning behind the behaviour found in my initial question.
现在,对于在单元测试期间使用 Volley 获得真实网络响应的解决方案,必须将执行程序更改为不使用主循环器.
Now for a solution as to getting real network responses with Volley during a unit test, the executor must be changed to not be using the main looper.
作为一个简单的解决方案,创建一个依赖于 Executor.singleThreadExecutor()
而不是 Main Looper 的请求队列.
As an easy solution, create a request queue that relies on Executor.singleThreadExecutor()
instead of the Main Looper.
这就是我的意思:
//Specific test queue that uses a singleThreadExecutor instead of the mainLooper for testing purposes.
public RequestQueue newVolleyRequestQueueForTest(final Context context) {
File cacheDir = new File(context.getCacheDir(), "cache/volley");
Network network = new BasicNetwork(new HurlStack());
ResponseDelivery responseDelivery = new ExecutorDelivery(Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor());
RequestQueue queue = new RequestQueue(new DiskBasedCache(cacheDir), network, 4, responseDelivery);
queue.start();
return queue;
}
然后,在测试期间将其用作 Volley 的请求队列.
Then, use that as your request queue for Volley during the tests.
这里的关键是:
ResponseDelivery responseDelivery = new ExecutorDelivery(Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor());
希望这会有所帮助!
这篇关于单元测试网络响应.在调试时工作,而不是在实际运行时工作的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!