根据它的JavaDoc,PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor 似乎负责用注解@PersistenceContext 注入EntityManager.它似乎暗示没有在 Spring 应用程序上下文 xml 中声明此 bean,@PersistenceContext 注释将不起作用.
According to its JavaDoc, PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor seems to be responsible for injecting the EntityManager with the annotation @PersistenceContext. It appears to imply without this bean declared in the Spring application context xml, the @PersistenceContext annotation won't work.
但是,根据我的实验,事实并非如此.
However, based on my experiments, this is not the truth.
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_1_0.xsd"
version="1.0">
<persistence-unit name="default" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL" />
</persistence>
<context:component-scan base-package="com.test.dao" />
<bean id="entityManagerFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="default"/>
<property name="jpaVendorAdapter">
<bean class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter">
<property name="showSql" value="true"/>
<property name="generateDdl" value="true"/>
<property name="databasePlatform" value="org.hibernate.dialect.DerbyDialect"/>
</bean>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
<property name="driverClassName" value="org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDriver"/>
<property name="url" value="jdbc:derby://localhost:1527/c:derbydbmydb"/>
<property name="username" value="APP"/>
<property name="password" value="APP"/>
</bean>
<tx:annotation-driven/>
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager">
<property name="entityManagerFactory" ref="entityManagerFactory" />
</bean>
<!--
<bean id="persistenceAnnotation" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
-->
@Repository("userDao")
public class UserDaoImpl implements UserDao {
@PersistenceContext
protected EntityManager entityManager;
@Transactional
public void save(User user) {
entityManager.persist(user);
}
}
无论我注释或取消注释persistenceAnnotation bean,结果都是一样的.把豆子留在身边也无妨,但是这豆子有什么用呢?
Whether I comment or uncomment the persistenceAnnotation bean, the result is the same. It doesn't hurt to leave the bean around, but what's the use of this bean?
我使用的是 Spring 3.0.5.
I am using Spring 3.0.5.
有人能提供一个取出这个 bean 会导致失败的场景吗?
Could someone provide a scenario where taking out this bean will result in failure?
我也不喜欢仅仅为了愚弄 Spring 而创建一个空的持久化单元.幸运的是,这个问题已经在 Spring 3.1.0 中得到解决.
Also I am not fond of creating an empty persistence unit just to fool Spring. Luckily this problem has been addressed in Spring 3.1.0.
PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
由 <context:annotation-config/>
元素激活了 bean,但是这个元素又被 <context:component-scan/><透明地激活了/代码>.
The PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
transparently activated by the <context:component-scan />
element. To be precise it's the <context:annotation-config />
element that activates the bean but this element in turn gets transparently activated by <context:component-scan />
.
这篇关于PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor 有什么用处吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!