我的单元测试中有任何问题,我有类似的东西.如果 blargh
函数使用 Transactional 注释,则模拟注入会在 someService 上被覆盖.如果我删除 Transactional ,则模拟会留在那里.从代码中可以看出,当服务中的函数被注释为事务时,Spring 会延迟加载服务,但在没有注释时会急切地加载服务.这会覆盖我注入的模拟.
I have any issue in my unit test where I have something along the lines of this. The mock injection get overridden on the someService if the blargh
function is annotated with Transactional. If I remove the Transactional the mock stays there. From watching the code it appears that Spring lazily loads the services when a function in the service is annotated with transactinal, but eagerly loads the services when it isn't. This overrides the mock I injected.
有没有更好的方法来做到这一点?
Is there a better way to do this?
@Component
public class SomeTests
{
@Autowired
private SomeService someService;
@Test
@Transactional
public void test(){
FooBar fooBarMock = mock(FooBar.class);
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(someService, "fooBar", fooBarMock);
}
}
@Service
public class someService
{
@Autowired FooBar foobar;
@Transactional // <-- this causes the mocked item to be overridden
public void blargh()
{
fooBar.doStuff();
}
}
或许您可以尝试通过以下方式实现您的测试:
Probably you could try to implement your test in the following way:
@Component
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class SomeTests
{
@Mock private FooBar foobar;
@InjectMocks private final SomeService someService = new SomeService();
@Test
@Transactional
public void test(){
when(fooBar.doStuff()).then....;
someService.blargh() .....
}
}
由于没有您的配置和相关代码,我现在无法尝试.但这是测试服务逻辑的常用方法之一.
I could not try it right now as don't have your config and related code. But this is one of the common way to test the service logic.
这篇关于如何将模拟注入具有@Transactional 的@Service的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!