当 Resharper 与自己争论时，人们如何知道更信任哪个角色?
When Resharper argues with itself, how does one know which persona to give more credence?
我想我发现了一些确实让 Resharper 感到困惑的代码(这显然是一个非常不寻常的案例 - 在使用了一天之后，我认为 Resharper 是蜜蜂的膝盖/自液化面包等以来最伟大的东西).
I think I have found some code that does confuse Resharper (this is apparently a very unusual case - after using it for a day, I think Resharper is the bee's knees/the greatest thing since liquified bread, etc.).
有了这行代码:
ICryptoTransform Encryptor = RijndaelCipher.CreateEncryptor(SecretKey.GetBytes(32), SecretKey.GetBytes(16));
Resharper 告诉我添加参数名称'rgbkey'" 然后添加参数名称'rgbIV'"
Resharper tells me to "add argument name 'rgbkey'" and then "add argument name 'rgbIV'"
所以这条线是:
ICryptoTransform Encryptor = RijndaelCipher.CreateEncryptor(rgbKey: SecretKey.GetBytes(32), rgbIV: SecretKey.GetBytes(16));
不过，当我再次运行 Resharper 时，它会说，
When I run Resharper again, though, it says,
冗余参数名称规范"-删除参数名称规范"(rgbkey)(然后是 rgbIV).
"Redundant argument name specification" - "Remove argument name specification" (rgbkey) (and then rgbIV).
不过，似乎任何一种方式都可以正常工作......
It seems either way works fine, though...
显式参数命名在强制参数上是可选的，所以这两种形式都是正确的"，问题是你更喜欢哪个?正如 vcsjones 所说，Resharper 只是为您提供一些重构选项以满足您的偏好.
Explicit parameter naming is optional on mandatory parameters, so both forms are "correct," the question is which do you like better? Like vcsjones said, Resharper is just giving you some refactoring options to suit your preferences.
这篇关于应该添加还是删除这些论点?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持跟版网！