我是 mongodb 的新手,我喜欢不用担心架构内容是多么容易,我有一个问题,假设您想要 mongo 中的 Id 属性,而 mongo 使用 ObjectId
来表示属性 Id,所以到目前为止,我认为您可以拥有或装饰一个 Id,如下所示,
Am new to mongodb and am liking how easy it is not to worry about schema stuff, I have a question suppose you want an Id property in mongo and mongo uses ObjectId
to denote property Id's, so far i see you can have or decorate an Id as follows,
public ObjectId Id {get; set;}
//or
[BsonId]
public string Id {get; set;}
//or
[BsonId]
[BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)]
public string Id {get; set;}
谁能向我解释为什么大多数人选择最后一种类型,发生了什么以及灵活性如何提供帮助.谢谢?
Can anyone explain to me why most people choose the last type, and whats going on and how the flexibility helps. Thanks?
1) 如果在强类型 TDocument
中有名为 Id、id 或 _id
的列类(集合中的项目类型),然后在 Mongo 中将生成名为 "_id"
的列.它还将为该列创建索引.如果尝试使用已存在的键插入项目,则会收到 重复键错误
异常.
1) If you have a column named Id, id or _id
, in your strongly typed TDocument
class (the item type in a collection), then a column named "_id"
will be generated in Mongo. It will also create an index for that column. You get a duplicate key error
exception if trying to insert an item with a key that already exists.
public ObjectId Id { get;放;}
将使用 ObjectId
的类型生成器,它看起来像 _id: ObjectId("57ade20771e59f422cc652d9")
.
public ObjectId Id { get; set; }
will use the type generator for ObjectId
and it will look like _id: ObjectId("57ade20771e59f422cc652d9")
.
public Guid _id { get;放;}
将使用 Guid 生成器生成类似 "_id" : BinData(3,"s2Td7qdghkywlfMSWMPzaA==")
.
public Guid _id { get; set; }
will use the Guid generator to produce smth like "_id" : BinData(3,"s2Td7qdghkywlfMSWMPzaA==")
.
public int Id { get;放;}
, public string id { get;放;}
, public byte[] _id { get;放;}
如果未指定,也将使用每种类型的默认值作为索引列.
public int Id { get; set; }
, public string id { get; set; }
, public byte[] _id { get; set; }
will also be index columns using the defaults for each type if not specified.
2) [BsonId]
使您可以灵活地以任何您想要的方式命名该索引.[BsonId] public Guid SmthElseOtherThanId { get;放;}
和 [BsonId] 公共字符串 StringId { get;放;}
将是索引;public Guid SmthElseOtherThanId { get;放;}
和 公共字符串 StringId { get;放;}
不会.mongodb 仍将在内部使用 _id
.
2) [BsonId]
gives you the flexibility of naming that index any way you want. [BsonId] public Guid SmthElseOtherThanId { get; set; }
and [BsonId] public string StringId { get; set; }
will be indexes; public Guid SmthElseOtherThanId { get; set; }
and public string StringId { get; set; }
won't. mongodb will still use _id
internally.
同理,public ObjectId SmthElseOtherThanId {get;set;}
没有 [BsonId]
修饰不会成为索引列.
Same logic, public ObjectId SmthElseOtherThanId {get; set;}
with no [BsonId]
decoration won't be an index column.
3) [BsonRepresentation]
让您可以在 Mongo 类型与内部 .Net 类型之间进行调整,如果它们之间存在转换.
3) [BsonRepresentation]
lets you juggle with the Mongo type vs the internal .Net type, if there's a conversion between them.
有 [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public ObjectId Id { get;放;}
等同于 public ObjectId Id { get;放;}
.
有 [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] 公共字符串 Id { get;放;}
是不同的.Mongo 会自己自动生成对象 id,但是你可以在 .net 中使用字符串,过滤查询等,因为对象 id 和字符串之间存在转换.
Having [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public string Id { get; set; }
is different however. Mongo will auto generate object ids by himself, however you will be able to use strings in .net, filter queries etc., because there is a conversion between object id and string.
有 [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public byte[] Id { get;放;}
或 [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public int Id { get;放;}
将失败,ObjectId 不是 ByteArraySerializer/Int32Serializer
消息的有效表示.
Having [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public byte[] Id { get; set; }
or [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId)] public int Id { get; set; }
will fail with a ObjectId not a valid representation for a ByteArraySerializer / Int32Serializer
message.
但是 [BsonId] [BsonRepresentation(BsonType.String)] public int StringId { get;放;}
就好了.
这篇关于在 C# 中使用 BsonRepresentation(BsonType.ObjectId) 与 BsonId 与 ObjectId 装饰属性的区别的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!