起初我认为它可以用于性能测量.但说 std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
可能不是稳定(is_steady
可能是 false
).也有人说std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
甚至可能是std::chrono::system_clock
的别名,一般不太稳定.所以我不能用这种类型的时钟测量时间间隔,因为随时可能调整时钟,我的测量结果会出错.
At first I thought it can be used for performance measurements. But it is said that std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
may be not steady (is_steady
may be false
). It is also said that std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
may even be an alias of std::chrono::system_clock
which is generally not steady. So I can't measure time intervals with this type of clock because at any moment the clock may be adjusted and my measurements will be wrong.
同时我无法将 std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
的时间点转换为日历时间,因为它没有 to_time_t
方法.所以我也无法使用这种类型的时钟获得实时.
At the same time I can't convert time points of std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
to calendar time because it doesn't have to_time_t
method. So I can't get the real time with this type of clock either.
那std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
有什么用?
没有.
抱歉,我不好.
如果您想使用high_resolution_clock
,请选择steady_clock
.在 libc++ 和 VS 上,high_resolution_clock
无论如何都是 steady_clock
的类型别名.
If you are tempted to use high_resolution_clock
, choose steady_clock
instead. On libc++ and VS high_resolution_clock
is a type alias of steady_clock
anyway.
在 gcc 上 high_resolution_clock
是 system_clock
的类型别名,我在这个平台上看到了不止一次 high_resolution_clock::to_time_t
的使用(这是错误的).
On gcc high_resolution_clock
is a type alias of system_clock
and I've seen more than one use of high_resolution_clock::to_time_t
on this platform (which is wrong).
做使用
.但是<chrono>
的某些部分您应该避免.
Do use <chrono>
. But there are parts of <chrono>
that you should avoid.
high_resolution_clock
..count()
和 .time_since_epoch()
除非没有其他方法可以完成工作.duration_cast
,除非代码没有它就无法编译,并且您希望截断到零的行为.high_resolution_clock
..count()
and .time_since_epoch()
unless there is no other way to get the job done.duration_cast
unless the code won't compile without it, and you desire truncation-towards-zero behavior.这篇关于std::chrono::high_resolution_clock 的用途是什么?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!