如果我将迭代器指向向量的最后一个元素时将其增加 2 会怎样?在这个问题中询问如何将迭代器调整为STL容器2 个元素提供了两种不同的方法:
What if I increment an iterator by 2 when it points onto the last element of a vector? In this question asking how to adjust the iterator to an STL container by 2 elements two different approaches are offered:
当迭代器指向 STL 容器的最后一个元素或其他元素时，我已经使用 VC++ 7 对它们进行了测试:
I've tested both of them with VC++ 7 for the edge case when the iterator points onto the last element of the STL container or beyond:
vector<int> vec;
vec.push_back( 1 );
vec.push_back( 2 );
vector<int>::iterator it = vec.begin();
advance( it, 2 );
bool isAtEnd = it == vec.end(); // true
it++; // or advance( it, 1 ); - doesn't matter
isAtEnd = it == vec.end(); //false
it = vec.begin();
advance( it, 3 );
isAtEnd = it == vec.end(); // false
在遍历 vector 和其他容器时，我可能多次看到建议与 vector::end() 进行比较:
I've seen may times an advise to compare against vector::end() when traversing the vector and other containers:
for( vector<int>::iterator it = vec.begin(); it != vec.end(); it++ ) {
//manipulate the element through the iterator here
}
显然，如果迭代器前进到循环内的最后一个元素之后，for-loop 语句中的比较将评估为 false，并且循环将继续进入未定义的行为.
Obviously if the iterator is advanced past the last element inside the loop the comparison in the for-loop statement will evaluate to false and the loop will happily continue into undefined behaviour.
如果我在迭代器上使用过 Advance() 或任何类型的增量操作并使它指向容器的末端，我将无法检测到这种情况，我做对了吗?如果是这样，最佳做法是什么 - 不使用此类改进?
Do I get it right that if I ever use advance() or any kind of increment operation on an iterator and make it point past the container's end I will be unable to detect this situation? If so, what is the best practice - not to use such advancements?
以下是 Nicolai Josuttis 书中的引述:
Following is the quote from Nicolai Josuttis book:
注意advance() 不检查是否越过 a 的 end()序列(它无法检查，因为迭代器一般不知道他们操作的容器).因此，调用这个函数可能导致未定义的行为，因为在 a 的末尾调用运算符 ++序列未定义
Note that advance() does not check whether it crosses the end() of a sequence (it can't check because iterators in general do not know the containers on which they operate). Thus, calling this function might result in undefined behavior because calling operator ++ for the end of a sequence is not defined
换句话说，维护范围内的迭代器的责任完全在于调用者.
In other words, the responsibility of maintaining the iterator within the range lies totally with the caller.
这篇关于如果增加一个等于 STL 容器的结束迭代器的迭代器会发生什么的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持跟版网！