考虑一下
void f(vector<const T*>& p)
{
}
int main()
{
vector<T*> nonConstVec;
f(nonConstVec);
}
以下不编译.问题是 vector
不能转换为 vector
,这似乎对我来说不合逻辑,因为存在从 T*
到 const T*
的隐式转换.这是为什么?
The following does not compile.The thing is that vector<T*>
can not be converted to vector <const T*>
, and that seems illogically to me , because there exists implicit conversion from T*
to const T*
. Why is this ?
vector
也不能转换为 vector
,但这是意料之中的,因为 const T*
不能隐式转换为 T*
.
vector<const T*>
can not be converted to vector <T*>
too, but that is expected because const T*
can not be converted implicitly to T*
.
我在您的代码中添加了几行.这足以说明为什么不允许这样做:
I've added a few lines to your code. That's sufficient to make it clear why this is disallowed:
void f(vector<const T*>& p)
{
static const T ct;
p.push_back(&ct); // adds a const T* to nonConstVec !
}
int main()
{
vector<T*> nonConstVec;
f(nonConstVec);
nonConstVec.back()->nonConstFunction();
}
这篇关于向量和常量的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!