考虑这个模板函数:
template<typename ReturnT>
ReturnT foo(const std::function<ReturnT ()>& fun)
{
return fun();
}
为什么编译器不能从传递的调用签名中推导出ReturnT
?
Why isn't it possible for the compiler to deduce ReturnT
from the passed call signature?
bool bar() { /* ... */ }
foo<bool>(bar); // works
foo(bar); // error: no matching function call
std::function<bool()> bar;
foo(bar); // works just fine
C++ 无法从您的函数 bar
推导出返回类型,因为它必须先知道类型,然后才能找到所有使用您的函数指针的构造函数.
C++ can't deduce the return type from your function bar
because it would have to know the type before it could find all the constructors that take your function pointer.
例如,谁能说 std::function
没有一个采用 bool (*)()
?
For example, who's to say that std::function<std::string()>
doesn't have a constructor taking a bool (*)()
?
这篇关于从 std::function 调用签名推导出模板参数的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!